Wednesday, July 22, 2009

Re: Humane-Rights-Agenda Beyond Attica; The Untold Story of Women's Resistance Behind Bars


 
palashcbiswas,
 gostokanan, sodepur, kolkata-700110 phone:033-25659551



From: Andrea Ball <aball001@neo.rr.com>
To: Iron Cage <IronCage@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, 22 July, 2009 17:18:08
Subject: Humane-Rights-Agenda Beyond Attica; The Untold Story of Women's Resistance Behind Bars

 

 
 
Beyond Attica: The Untold Story of Women's Resistance Behind Bars
By Hans Bennett, AlterNet
Posted on July 21, 2009, Printed on July 22, 2009
http://www.alternet .org/story/ 141474/
 

"When I was 15, my friends started going to jail," says Victoria Law, 
a native New Yorker. "Chinatown's gangs were recruiting in the high 
schools in Queens and, faced with the choice of stultifying days 
learning nothing in overcrowded classrooms or easy money, many of my 
friends had dropped out to join a gang."
 
"One by one," Law recalls, "they landed in Rikers Island, an entire 
island in New York City devoted to pretrial detainment for those who 
can not afford bail."
 
Law shares this and other recollections in her new book, Resistance 
Behind Bars: The Struggles of Incarcerated Women (PM Press). At 16, 
she herself decided to join a gang, but was arrested for the armed 
robbery that she committed for her initiation into the gang. "Because 
it was my first arrest -- and probably because 16-year-old Chinese 
girls who get straight As in school did not seem particularly 
menacing -- I was eventually let off with probation," she writes.
 
Before her release from jail, Law was held in the "Tombs" awaiting 
arraignment. While the adult women she met there had all been 
arrested for prostitution, she also met three teenagers arrested for 
unarmed assault. "Two of the girls were black lesbian lovers. In a 
scenario that would be repeated 13 years later in the case of the New 
Jersey Four, they had been out with friends when they encountered a 
cab driver who had tried to grab one of them. Her friends intervened, 
the cab driver called the police and the girls were arrested for 
assault." Law notes that "both of my cellmates were subsequently sent 
to Rikers Island."
 
These early experiences, coupled with her later discovery of radical 
politics, pushed Law "to think about who goes to prison and why." She 
got involved in several projects to support prisoners, which included 
helping to start Books Through Bars in New York City, sending free 
books to prisoners. In college, she "began researching current 
prisoner organizing and resistance," and upon discovering almost zero 
documentation of resistance from women prisoners, she began her own 
documentation and directly contacted women prisoners who were 
resisting. A college paper became a widely distributed pamphlet, and 
at the request of several women prisoners she'd corresponded with, 
Law helped to publish their writings in a zine called Tenacious: Art 
and Writings from Women in Prison. Law writes that the zine and 
pamphlet "heightened awareness not only about incarcerated women's 
issues, but also women's actions to challenge and change the 
injustices they faced on a daily basis."
 
"This book is the result of seven and a half years of reading, 
writing, listening, and supporting women in prison," Law says about 
Resistance Behind Bars, noting that each chapter in her book "focuses 
on an issue that women themselves have identified as important." The 
chapters include topics as diverse as health care, the relationship 
between mothers and daughters, sexual abuse, education, and 
resistance among women in immigration detention. Resistance Behind 
Bars paints a picture of women prisoners resisting a deeply flawed 
prison system, which Law hopes will help to empower both the women 
held in cages and those on the outside working to support them.
 
Who Goes To Prison?
 
Since 1970, the U.S. prison population has skyrocketed, from 300,000 
to over 2.3 million. According to the U.S. Justice Department, this 
staggering increase has not resulted from a rise in crime. In fact, 
since 1993, the prison population has increased by over one million, 
but during this same period, both property offenses and serious 
violent crime have been steadily declining. The New York Times 
recently cited a 2008 report by the International Center for Prison 
Studies at King's College London documenting that the U.S. has more 
prisoners than any other country. Furthermore, with 751 out of 
100,000 people, and one out of every 100 adults in prison or jail, 
the U.S. also has the highest incarceration rate in the world. With 
only five percent of the world's population, the U.S. has almost a 
quarter of the world's prisoners.
 
While women comprise only nine percent of the U.S. prison population, 
their numbers have been increasing at a faster rate than men. As Law 
documents, "between 1990 and 2000, the number of women in prison rose 
108 percent, from 44,065 to 93,234. (The male prison population grew 
77 percent during that same time period.) By the end of 2006, 112,498 
women were behind bars."
 
Like with male incarceration rates, women behind bars are 
disproportionately low-income and people of color. Law writes that 
"only 40 percent of all incarcerated women had been employed full-
time before incarceration. Of those, most had held low-paying jobs: a 
study of women under supervision (prison, jail, parole or probation) 
found that two-thirds had never held a job that paid more than $6.50 
per hour. Approximately 37 percent earned less than $600 per month."
 
A 2007 Bureau of Justice study documented that 358 of every 100,000 
Black women, 152 of every 100,000 Latinas, and 94 of every 100,000 
white women are incarcerated. Explaining this racial discrepancy, Law 
argues that inner-city Black and Latino neighborhoods are 
disproportionately targeted by law enforcement. She cites a 2005 U.S. 
Department of Justice study which concluded that Blacks and Latinos 
are "three times as likely as whites to be searched, arrested, 
threatened or subdued with force when stopped by the police."
 
The so-called "War on Drugs" has played a key role in the growth of 
the U.S. prison population. Law writes about the impact of New York 
State's Rockefeller Drug Laws passed in 1973, "which required a 
sentence of 15 years to life for anyone convicted of selling two 
ounces or possessing four ounces of a narcotic, regardless of 
circumstances or prior history. That year, only 400 women were 
imprisoned in New York State. As of January 1, 2001, there were 
3,133. Over 50 percent had been convicted of a drug offense and 20 
percent were convicted solely of possession. Other states passed 
similar laws, causing the number of women imprisoned nationwide for 
drug offenses to rise 888 percent from 1986 to 1996."
 
Distinguishing women prisoners from their male counterparts, Law 
cites a Bureau of Justice study which "found that women were three 
times more likely than men to have been physically or sexually abused 
prior to incarceration. "
 
Women Prisoners Don't Resist?
 
The central thesis of Resistance Behind Bars is truly profound. In 
clear, non-academic language, Law argues that recent scholarship 
documenting and radically criticizing the increased incarceration 
rates and mistreatment of women prisoners "largely ignores what the 
women themselves do to change or protest these circumstances, thus 
reinforcing the belief that incarcerated women do not organize." 
Alongside academia, Law also harshly criticizes radical prison 
activists, arguing that "just as the civil rights movement of the 
1960s and 1970s downplayed the role of women in favor of highlighting 
male spokesmen and leaders, the prisoners' rights movement has 
focused and continues to focus on men to speak for the masses."
 
Law gives honorable mention to two books that documented women's 
resistance at Bedford Hills Correctional Facility in New York State: 
Juanita Diaz-Cotto's Gender, Ethnicity, and the State (1996) and the 
collectively written Breaking the Walls of Silence: AIDS and Women in 
a New York State Maximum Security Prison (1998). Since these two 
books "no other book-length work has focused on incarcerated women's 
activism and resistance," writes Law. As a result, Law argues that 
women prisoners "lack a commonly known history of resistance. While 
male prisoners can draw on the examples of George Jackson, the Attica 
uprising and other well-publicized cases of prisoner activism, 
incarcerated women remain unaware of precedents relevant to them."
 
Epitomizing the scholarship that Law criticizes, author Virginia High 
Brislin wrote that "women inmates themselves have called very little 
attention to their situations," and "are hardly ever involved in 
violent encounters with officials (i.e. riots), nor do they initiate 
litigation as often as do males in prison."
 
To challenge Brislin's assertion, Law gives numerous examples of 
women rioting and initiating litigation, including the "August 
Rebellion" in 1974 at Bedford Hills Correctional Facility in New York 
State. On July 2, 1974, prisoner Carol Crooks won a lawsuit against 
prison authorities, with the court "issuing a preliminary injunction, 
prohibiting the prison from placing women in segregation without 24-
hour notice and a hearing of these charges," writes Law. In response, 
"five male guards beat Crooks and placed her in segregation. Her 
fellow prisoners protested by holding seven staff members hostage for 
two and a half hours. However, 'the August Rebellion' is virtually 
unknown today despite that fact that male state troopers and (male) 
guards from men's prisons were called to suppress the uprising, 
resulting in 25 women being injured and 24 women being transferred to 
Matteawan Complex for the Criminally Insane without the required 
commitment hearings."
 
Law also criticizes author Karlene Faith, who acknowledges that women 
resist, but who wrote that in the 1970s, women prisoners "were not as 
politicized as the men [prisoners], and they did not engage in the 
kinds of protest actions that aroused media attention." To challenge 
Faith's argument, Law cites several rebellions that received 
significant media attention, including one that the New York Times 
wrote two stories about. As Law recounts, "in 1975, women at the 
North Carolina Correctional Center for Women held a sit-down 
demonstration to demand better medical care, improved counseling 
services, and the closing of the prison laundry. When prison guards 
attempted to end the protest by herding the women into the gymnasium 
and beating them, the women fought back, using volleyball net poles, 
chunks of concrete and hoe handles to drive the guards out of the 
prison. Over 100 guards from other prisons were summoned to quell the 
rebellion."
 
In light of the many such stories documented in Resistance Behind 
Bars, Law argues that "instead of claiming that women in prison did 
not engage in riots and protest actions that captured media 
attention, scholars and researchers should examine why these acts of 
organizing fail to attract the same critical and scholarly attention 
as that given to similar male actions."
 
Resisting With Media-Activism
 
In the chapter "Grievances, Lawsuits, and the Power of the Media," 
Law observes that "gaining media attention often gains quicker 
results than filing lawsuits." Among the many organizing victories 
that were significantly aided by media attention, in 1999, Nightline 
focused on conditions at California's Valley State Prison for Women. 
Law explains that "after prisoner after prisoner told Nightline 
anchor Ted Koppel about being given a pelvic exam as 'part of the 
treatment' for any ailment, including stomach problems or diabetes, 
Koppel asked the prison's chief medical officer Dr. Anthony 
DiDomenico, for an explanation. "
 
DiDomenico was apparently so confident that he would not be held 
accountable for his misconduct, that he answered Koppel by saying 
"I've heard inmates tell me they would deliberately like to be 
examined. It's the only male contact they get." After this interview 
was aired, DiDomenico was reassigned to a desk job, and as of 2001 he 
had been criminally indicted, along with a second doctor.
 
Demonstrating the power of this media coverage, Law notes that the 
"prisoner advocacy organization Legal Services for Prisoners with 
Children had been reporting the prisoners' complaints about medical 
staff's sexual misconduct to the CDC for four years with no result."
 
Along with agitating for coverage in the mainstream media, women 
prisoners have also created their own media projects. The chapter 
titled "Breaking The Silence: Incarcerated Women's Media" documents 
many important projects. Law explains that these projects are 
necessary because women prisoners' "voices and stories still remain 
unheard by both mainstream and activist-oriented media. Articles 
about both prison conditions and prisoners often portray the male 
prisoner experience, ignoring the different issues facing women in 
prison." Therefore, "women's acts of writing -- and publishing -- 
often serve a dual purpose: they challenge existing stereotypes and 
distortions of prisoners and prison life, framing and correcting 
prevailing (mis) perceptions. They also boost women's sense of self-
worth and agency in a system designed to not only isolate and 
alienate its prisoners but also erase all traces of individuality. "
 
Some activist-oriented publications have been receptive and have 
published prisoners' writings. From 1999 until its final issue in 
2002, the radical feminist magazine Sojourner: A Women's Forum 
featured a section on women prisoner issues which included writings 
from the prisoners themselves. Law writes that this section, entitled 
"Inside/Outside" covered many topics, including "working conditions 
in women's facilities, the dehumanizing treatment of children 
visiting their mothers, and prisoner suicides.
 
Law spotlights many different projects. From 2002 to 2006, 
Perceptions was a monthly newspaper published by and for the women at 
the Edna Mahan Correctional Facility for Women in New Jersey. Because 
of censorship from prison warden Charlotte Blackwell, Perceptions was 
forced to limit its criticism of the prison, but the women published 
what they could. For example, in one issue, women wrote about how 
they would run the prison differently if they were in charge. Law 
notes that "their fantasies revealed the absence of programming for 
older women and those in the maximum custody unit, emergency 
counseling and therapeutic interventions and opportunities for mother-
child interactions. It also drew attention to the facility's 
overcrowding and increased potentials for violence and conflict among 
prisoners."
 
Tenacious, the zine published by Law, was initiated by women 
prisoners who sought the help of friends outside the prison to 
actually publish and distribute it. "Free from the need to seek 
administrative approval, incarcerated women wrote about the 
difficulties of parenting from prison, dangerously inadequate health 
care, sexual assault by prison staff and the scarcity of educational 
and vocational opportunities, especially in comparison to their male 
counterparts. Although circulation remained small, the women's 
stories provoked public response," writes Law.
 
"Prison officials do whatever they can to strip prisoners of their 
dignity and self-worth," stated Barrilee Bannister, one of the 
founders of Tenacious. "Writing is my way to escape the confines of 
prison and the debilitating ailments of prison life. It's me putting 
on boxing gloves and stepping into the rink of freedom of speech and 
opinion."
 
Arguing For Prison Abolition
 
When Victoria Law was first introduced to radical politics, shortly 
after her own stint behind bars, she "discovered groups and 
literature espousing prison abolition."
 
"These analyses -- coupled with what I had seen firsthand -- made 
sense, steering me to work towards the dismantling, rather than the 
reform, of the prison system." Law's subsequent research has only 
served to affirm her belief in the need for abolition. She states 
clearly that "this book should not be mistaken for a call for more 
humane or 'gender responsive' prisons."
 
Some readers may view Law's prison abolitionist politics as being 
abstract or overly theoretical. However, to support her abolitionist 
viewpoint, she makes the practical argument that prisons simply don't 
work to reduce crime or increase public safety. She writes that 
"incarceration has not decreased crime; instead, 'tough on crime' 
policies have led to the criminalization … of more activities, 
leading to higher rates of arrest, prosecution and incarceration 
while shifting money and resources away from other public entities, 
such as education, housing, health care, drug treatment, and other 
societal supports. The growing popularity of abolitionist thought can 
be seen in the expansion of organizations such as Critical 
Resistance, an organization fighting to end the need for a prison-
industrial complex, and the formation of groups working to address 
issues of crime and victimization without relying on the police or 
prisons."
 
Towards the end of Resistance Behind Bars, Law quotes Angela Y. 
Davis, who is a leading activist intellectual of the prison 
abolitionist movement. In her recent book Are Prisons Obsolete?, 
Davis writes that "a major challenge of this movement is to do the 
work that will create more human, habitable environments for people 
in prison without bolstering the permanence of the prison system. 
How, then, do we accomplish this balancing act of passionately 
attending to the needs of prisoners -- calling for less violent 
conditions, an end to sexual assault, improved physical and mental 
health care, greater access to drug programs, better educational work 
opportunities, unionization of prison labor, more connections with 
families and communities, shorter or alternative sentencing -- and at 
the same time call for alternatives to sentencing altogether, no more 
prison construction, and abolitionist strategies that question the 
place of the prison in our future?"
 
As if answering Davis' question, Law concludes that while striving 
for prison abolition "we need to also reach in, make contact with 
those who have been isolated by prison walls and societal 
indifference and listen to those who are speaking out, like many of 
the women who have shared their stories within this book. Because 
abolishing prisons will not happen tomorrow, next week or even next 
year, we need to break through these barriers, communicate, work with 
and support women who are in resistance today."
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
------------ --------- --------- ------
 

 
__._,_.___
<>~+~<>~+~<>~+~<>~+~<>~+~<>~+~<>~+~<>~+~<>
Liberate Brother Leonard Peltier and Prisoners of Amerikan Fascism!
To Subscribe Go To: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Humane-Rights-Agenda
To Unsubscribe Go To: Humane-Rights-Agenda-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Group Home Page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Humane-Rights-Agenda/
<>~+~<>~+~<>~+~<>~+~<>~+~<>~+~<>~+~<>~+~<>
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Give Back

Yahoo! for Good

Get inspired

by a good cause.

Y! Toolbar

Get it Free!

easy 1-click access

to your groups.

Yahoo! Groups

Start a group

in 3 easy steps.

Connect with others.

.

__,_._,___

No comments: